Too many options? Try the 37% Rule + Satisficing
Drowning in options and running out of time?
Whether you're hunting for a cozy apartment in NYC, filtering through job candidates, or even just lost in the world of gelato flavors π¦, sometimes life feels like an infinite scroll of choices.
But what if I told you there are a mathematically proven hacks to optimizing these decisions?
π I use a Dynamic Duo: the 37% Rule and Satisficing β power-packed principles from the realms of mathematics and economics to supercharge your decision-making.
37% Rule: Think of interviewing candidates for a pivotal role. Once you've seen a candidate, there's no turning back. This scenario is a metaphor for many of life's irreversible choices. So how do you secure the best fit? The formula is simple: Dedicate the first 37% of your time (or options) for observing and learning, setting your quality threshold. For the subsequent part? Jump on the first choice that sails past your set bar. You've reached your optimal decision sweet spot.
Satisficing: Originating from the economic landscape, the term combines 'satisfy' and 'suffice'. Rather than chasing the elusive 'perfect', it's about zeroing in on what's 'good enough'. Set a clear benchmark and go for the first option that matches or tops it.
Now, letβs take this to the real world. Apartment hunting in a hot market, perhaps? You have a month to find the perfect place. The pressureβs on! β³π’
Instead of getting overwhelmed, split your approach. The first 11 days? That's your window to explore, get a feel of the market, and more crucially, determine what's "good enough" for you. This concept of settling for what's sufficient rather than perfect is what we call "satisficing".
Once those 11 days are up, switch gears. Youβve got your benchmark, your "good enough". Now, for the rest of the month, commit to the first apartment that hits or exceeds that mark. No more second-guessing. No more endless search. Just a strategic, efficient approach to decision-making.
The beauty of the 37% rule combined with "satisficing" is that it can be applied to almost any decision where time or options are limited.
It's all about using that initial period for data gathering and benchmark setting, and then acting decisively.
So, the next time you're faced with a decision and the clock's ticking, ask yourself: Have I used my first 37% wisely? What's my "good enough"? And then, take the leap! π
Remember, life and decision making are not about finding the perfect choice, but the right choice in the given constraints. And you can build your confidence about whatβs right for you using this dynamic duo. Itβs about decisiveness over endless deliberation.
By following this methdology, youβre maximizing your chance of making the best decisions with the lowest amount of stress.β¨ Happy decision-making! πππ―
Last updated